![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgqsHXkeP54y07fYFUaFdca7d5s18aV15wKye0WUXPUkAtvZmf8oNhFYidCmAJeJJDI1D-Xrn1XlYp6UMJ3qk9AQj8suVocQpL8andR0h-Jf9UxPVTq05Qw_AzQDcdQIO4EHgNsZVRuV-s/s400/holmes-sherlock-2010.jpg)
The 2010 rendition of the original by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle as reinterpreted by Steven Moffat (Doctor Who), Mark Gatiss (The League of Gentlemen) and Steve Thompson (Whipping It Up) is an absolutely fantastic retelling of the original classic into a contemporary context. Fabulously reintroducing Holmes and Dr. Watson in a modern context but by no means forgetting the original spirit of their Victorian counterparts. Before I proceed any further, I do have to remind anyone reading this that there might be some spoilers ahead. I try to conceal certain things such as series plots but sometimes things do slip. So proceed with caution, I suggest.
Now, something that I truly enjoy in the mini series is the use of bokeh (or focusing on only the essential part of the visual, or something similar to tilt-shift photography I suppose) to produce a very different way of introducing parts of London, it definitely differs from the ones I'm used to, namely the use of zooming and panning from one part of the location to the other. To add, the visualisation of a very grimy and gloomy London gives a gritty aesthetic to the series and it also adds mystery to the already puzzling crimes Holmes and Watson have to face. There's also one other visual aid that I truly enjoy in this movie that is the addition of appearing types when a character is sent a message to their mobile devices or the trail of thoughts by particular characters or the notes and messages the characters are reading, instead of using cuts to the actual paper or devices. It somewhat reminds me of Stranger than Fiction's use of types and infographics to aid the viewers. Truly enjoyable.
Anyway, besides that rambling what I truly enjoy is how the stories were reinterpreted, they differ but certain elements stayed true to the original. Having said that, for those who are not very familiar with Sherlock Holmes' original adventures shouldn't worry because the story will most probably not deter you from enjoying Sherlock's antics and Dr. John Watson's perplexity at his roommate's behaviours and strange occupation. And on another side note, I truly enjoy the lack of technological scientific gizmos that seems to encompass most of today's TV series. The series doesn't rely heavily on technology under most of the circumstances but rather on Holmes' amazing amount of resources and knowledge stored in his mind. It was truly enjoyable to watch how Holmes arrive at his conclusions mostly in terms of how he deducted certain characters'/ victims'/villains' personalities and character traits. It might be perplexing at first but suddenly it all made a lot of sense. As is always the case when you read the novels.
Now let's move on to the actors, Benedict Cumberbatch is excellent as Sherlock Holmes and Martin Freeman is exceptional as Dr. John Watson. And they managed to portray the characters so well in terms of adjusting these fictional classics and transfer them into a modern era. Perhaps what intrigued me a lot was the way Freeman interpreted Watson, in the novels I always thought of Watson as a reserved person who gives occasional warnings to Sherlock but for the most part becomes a quiet observer and student of Holmes, in this series he is still as reserved but perhaps shows a lot more human character compared to how Doyle seems to portray Watson in the books. I actually prefer how Freeman portrayed Watson in the series, truly truly adore him. Cumberbatch is compelling as Holmes, the way he walked, talked and acted is perfectly in tune with how I always pictured Holmes. Perhaps I also think that is partly why I didn't extensively take much notice of Holmes, because he is just the way he is. I'm not sure whether that was a critique or a compliment but all in all excellent actors have to be saluted.
The story is fast paced and have quite quick in-between transitions but otherwise it is nicely structured. It gives enough glimpses for us to understand without feeling being left behind nor overwhelmed. Of course, perhaps I am just singing it praises but for someone who truly loves the original books I would definitely recommend this to anyone who love detective, crime stories and intriguing mysteries (perhaps you may already well aware of who the culprits are because some of them do indeed stay true to the original so it might not be much of a surprise). Now, to look forward to Gareth David-Lloyd as Dr. John Watson in the US production of Sherlock Holmes TV series. I am very much looking forward to it. *tips hat*